Netiquette IQTen Precepts of Netiquette

Ten Precepts of Netiquette

1.   No one ever gets fired for sending an email with the proper considerations

2.   Politeness works with even the rudest of people

3.   A policy and process of consistent correct email will contribute to actual time savings

4.   Utilize the Three Z's - avoidance of Zero tolerance, well directed Zeal and email Zen

5.   Personalize when appropriate

6.   Know when to apologize and do so quickly

7.   Reply to every reasonable email promptly

8.   Avoid scolding, one up-man-ship and imperatives

9.   Include good news first

10. Be proactive not reactive

=======================

   Good Netiquette And A Green Internet To All!  =====================================================================

Tabula Rosa Systems - Tabula Rosa Systems (TRS) is dedicated to providing Best of Breed Technology and Best of Class Professional Services to our Clients. We have a portfolio of products which we have selected for their capabilities, viability and value. TRS provides product, design, implementation and support services on all products that we represent. Additionally, TRS provides expertise in Network Analysis, eBusiness Application Profiling, ePolicy and eBusiness Troubleshooting. We can be contacted at:

sales@tabularosa.net  or 609 818 1802.

 ===============================================================

In addition to this blog, Netiquette IQ has a website with great assets which are being added to on a regular basis. I have authored the premiere book on Netiquette, “Netiquette IQ - A Comprehensive Guide to Improve, Enhance and Add Power to Your Email". My new book, “You’re Hired! Super Charge Your Email Skills in 60 Minutes. . . And Get That Job!” has just been published and will be followed by a trilogy of books on Netiquette for young people. You can view my profile, reviews of the book and content excerpts at:

 www.amazon.com/author/paulbabicki

Anyone who would like to review the book and have it posted on my blog or website, please contact me paul@netiquetteiq.com.

In addition to this blog, I maintain a radio show on BlogtalkRadio  and an online newsletter via paper.li.I have established Netiquette discussion groups with Linkedin and  Yahoo.  I am also a member of the International Business Etiquette and Protocol Group and Minding Manners among others. I regularly consult for the Gerson Lehrman Group, a worldwide network of subject matter experts and I have been contributing to the blogs Everything Email and emailmonday . My work has appeared in numerous publications and I have presented to groups such as The Breakfast Club of NJ and  PSG of Mercer County.

Netiquette IQ Blog Of 2/9/2017 - Informal Fallacies

One of my favorite parts of Philosophy is logic. Logic is also a cornerstone

Common Logical Fallacies. I devote sections about Logic in my books noted below. Feel free to check them out via the links to Amazon!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Brief Definitions of Informal Fallacies With Links to Examples and Discussions

Straw man is a fallacy in which an opponent's argument is overstated or misrepresen

ted in order to be more easily attacked or refuted. 

by Richard Nordquist

Updated August 14, 2017 

For those who need a little refresher, here are some of the most common informal logical fallacies.

It may have happened to you while reading comments on a blog, watching a political commercial, or listening to a talking head on a chat show. A mental alarm goes off signaling that what you're reading, watching, or listening to is utter claptrap and twaddle.

For me, the BS alert sounded when I ran across these random observations in the "Vox Populi" column of the local newspaper:

• Learning how to swim does not guarantee you won't drown. I'm 55 years old, have never learned to swim and I haven't drowned.
• We need to pass a law that stupid people are not allowed to own pets.
• I'm aggravated with spaghetti sauce with vegetables. I love vegetables, but I don't want them in my spaghetti sauce. Where's our freedom going?
• Regarding the person who had to "tote" stuff at Wal-Mart; tote? Carry. What is wrong with people? You don't "tote" stuff, you carry it.
• The English language is the only language that should be spoken in the open and none other. This is the United States of America.
• Those of us who are true taxpaying, working Americans need to stand up and demand that people should have certain education, I.Q. and income levels to be able to vote for president or any major political office.
• Anyone who thinks that interest in books is waning hasn't paid much attention. I love the show Face the Nation and they recently had eight authors on!

• Isn't it amazing that Savannah is ranked as 10 on America's most snobbish city [list] and that 10 percent of Savannah's population are Yankees?
• Obama shouldn't go to Martha's Vineyard. Every time he does, something major happens.

At these head-slapping moments, it may help to recall some of those informal logical fallacies that we once studied in school.

At least then we can put a name to the nonsense.

In case you need a little refresher, here are 12 common fallacies. For examples and detailed discussions, click on the highlighted terms.

1. Ad Hominem
   A personal attack: that is, an argument based on the perceived failings of an adversary rather than on the merits of the case.
2. Ad Misericordiam
   An argument that involves an irrelevant or highly exaggerated appeal to pity or sympathy.
3. Bandwagon
   An argument based on the assumption that the opinion of the majority is always valid: everyone believes it, so you should too.
4. Begging the Question
   A fallacy in which the premise of an argument presupposes the truth of its conclusion; in other words, the argument takes for granted what it's supposed to prove. Also known as a circular argument.
5. Dicto Simpliciter
   An argument in which a general rule is treated as universally true regardless of the circumstances: a sweeping generalization.
6. False Dilemma
   A fallacy of oversimplification: an argument in which only two alternatives are provided when in fact additional options are available. Sometimes called the either-or fallacy.
7. Name Calling
   A fallacy that relies on emotionally loaded terms to influence an audience.
8. Non Sequitur
   An argument in which a conclusion doesn't follow logically from what preceded it.

9.     Post Hoc
A fallacy in which one event is said to be the cause of a later event simply because it occurred earlier.

10. Red Herring
    An observation that draws attention away from the central issue in an argument or discussion.
11. Stacking the Deck
    A fallacy in which any evidence that supports an opposing argument is simply rejected, omitted, or ignored.
12. Straw Man
    A fallacy in which an opponent's argument is overstated or misrepresented in order to be more easily attacked or refuted.

========================

   Good Netiquette And A Green Internet To All!  =====================================================================

Tabula Rosa Systems - Tabula Rosa Systems (TRS) is dedicated to providing Best of Breed Technology and Best of Class Professional Services to our Clients. We have a portfolio of products which we have selected for their capabilities, viability and value. TRS provides product, design, implementation and support services on all products that we represent. Additionally, TRS provides expertise in Network Analysis, eBusiness Application Profiling, ePolicy and eBusiness Troubleshooting. We can be contacted at:

sales@tabularosa.net  or 609 818 1802.

 ===============================================================

In addition to this blog, Netiquette IQ has a website with great assets which are being added to on a regular basis. I have authored the premiere book on Netiquette, “Netiquette IQ - A Comprehensive Guide to Improve, Enhance and Add Power to Your Email". My new book, “You’re Hired! Super Charge Your Email Skills in 60 Minutes. . . And Get That Job!” has just been published and will be followed by a trilogy of books on Netiquette for young people. You can view my profile, reviews of the book and content excerpts at:

 www.amazon.com/author/paulbabicki

Anyone who would like to review the book and have it posted on my blog or website, please contact me paul@netiquetteiq.com.

In addition to this blog, I maintain a radio show on BlogtalkRadio  and an online newsletter via paper.li.I have established Netiquette discussion groups with Linkedin and  Yahoo.  I am also a member of the International Business Etiquette and Protocol Group and Minding Manners among others. I regularly consult for the Gerson Lehrman Group, a worldwide network of subject matter experts and I have been contributing to the blogs Everything Email and emailmonday . My work has appeared in numerous publications and I have presented to groups such as The Breakfast Club of NJ and  PSG of Mercer County.

Tabula Rosa Systems Blog Of 2/8/17- How To Use Italics

Note: the following list is from my boos, noted below. They contain significant content for avoiding spam

From thoughtco.com

The Easiest Way to Remember Who vs. Whom

Are You Confused? Who Isn't!

by Grace Fleming

Updated February 03, 2018

Let's face it, whom is a problem word. Nobody seems to be quite sure about its proper usage. As a matter of fact, some of the rules that have dictated its use in the past are now considered "old fashioned" and are commonly ignored.

The truth is, very few people use whom in speech when it's technically correct. Even scholars who know the rules don't always apply them. It just sounds too puffy sometimes.

"Whom were you talking to?" just sounds a little uptight, doesn't it? Most teachers will use the word who in this case, even if they know better.

Nonetheless, the word still exists, and some people do take all grammar rules very seriously. Some college officials, for example, will want to see and hear excellent grammar in your communications. It's well worth your while to understand the basic rules underlying the use of who and whom.

The key to understanding when to use who or whom is knowing the difference between subjective case and objective case. Can you always identify the subject of a sentence? Once you can easily identify the subject of a sentence or clause, you will be able to figure out the correct usage of who and whom.

Whom Is Used as an Object

• Who is at the door?
• Whom did you see at the door?

Do you understand why who is correct in one sentence and whom is correct in the other? The answer is, who is always used as the subject of a sentence or clause, and whom is always used as an object.

In the first sentence of the set above, who is the subject. In the second sentence, you is the subject and whom is the direct object.

• Whom did you recommend for the job?
• Are there any people whom you would recommend?

Notice, in both sentences, you is the subject. Whom is the object of the verb recommend.

Whom Is Also Used as the Object of a Preposition

Prepositions include words like to, for, about, under, over, of, after, and before.

Look at these examples:

• I'll begin my letter with the phrase: To Whom It May Concern.
• I don't know from whom the love letter came.
• They fought over whom?
• After whom do I enter the stage?

Do you think these sentence sound odd? They do, indeed. That is exactly why the word whom will probably disappear from the English language one day. It just sounds a little awkward in many circumstances, even when it's technically correct.

So What Can You Do?

First of all, consider your audience. If you find yourself speaking to a person you'd like to impress, like an admission official from Harvard University, for example, then you should simply pause and think before you speak.

It won't sound strange. Think about it; many intelligent people pause a lot while they're talking. They're thinking before they speak!

So if you're speaking in an important situation like the one above, stop and think before using who or whom. Is it subjective case or objective you want to use?

If you're confused about subjects and objects and can't think fast when you find yourself speaking in public, you can either avoid using who and whom or you can go with your gut feeling and say whichever sounds better.

You'll probably be right.

You can also use this simple test in your head.

Silently replace the word with he or him to see which sounds better. He is the equivalent of who (subjective) and him is the equivalent of whom (objective).

For instance, if you want to decide which is correct in this sentence:

Who/Whom should I consider as a college recommendation?

Re-arrange the sentence in your head so it will make sense using him or he. You'll come up with the following choices:

I should consider him...
I should consider he... Him is clearly better. Therefore, the correct word in the sentence above will be whom

========================

   Good Netiquette And A Green Internet To All!  =====================================================================

Tabula Rosa Systems - Tabula Rosa Systems (TRS) is dedicated to providing Best of Breed Technology and Best of Class Professional Services to our Clients. We have a portfolio of products which we have selected for their capabilities, viability and value. TRS provides product, design, implementation and support services on all products that we represent. Additionally, TRS provides expertise in Network Analysis, eBusiness Application Profiling, ePolicy and eBusiness Troubleshooting. We can be contacted at:

sales@tabularosa.net  or 609 818 1802.

 ===============================================================

In addition to this blog, Netiquette IQ has a website with great assets which are being added to on a regular basis. I have authored the premiere book on Netiquette, “Netiquette IQ - A Comprehensive Guide to Improve, Enhance and Add Power to Your Email". My new book, “You’re Hired! Super Charge Your Email Skills in 60 Minutes. . . And Get That Job!” has just been published and will be followed by a trilogy of books on Netiquette for young people. You can view my profile, reviews of the book and content excerpts at:

 www.amazon.com/author/paulbabicki

Anyone who would like to review the book and have it posted on my blog or website, please contact me paul@netiquetteiq.com.

In addition to this blog, I maintain a radio show on BlogtalkRadio  and an online newsletter via paper.li.I have established Netiquette discussion groups with Linkedin and  Yahoo.  I am also a member of the International Business Etiquette and Protocol Group and Minding Manners among others. I regularly consult for the Gerson Lehrman Group, a worldwide network of subject matter experts and I have been contributing to the blogs Everything Email and emailmonday . My work has appeared in numerous publications and I have presented to groups such as The Breakfast Club of NJ and  PSG of Mercer County.

Netiquette IQ Blog Of 2/7/2018 - How to Remember Who vs. Whom

Note: the following list is from my boos, noted below. They contain significant content for avoiding spam

From thoughtco.com

The Easiest Way to Remember Who vs. Whom

Are You Confused? Who Isn't!

by Grace Fleming

Updated February 03, 2018

Let's face it, whom is a problem word. Nobody seems to be quite sure about its proper usage. As a matter of fact, some of the rules that have dictated its use in the past are now considered "old fashioned" and are commonly ignored.

The truth is, very few people use whom in speech when it's technically correct. Even scholars who know the rules don't always apply them. It just sounds too puffy sometimes.

"Whom were you talking to?" just sounds a little uptight, doesn't it? Most teachers will use the word who in this case, even if they know better.

Nonetheless, the word still exists, and some people do take all grammar rules very seriously. Some college officials, for example, will want to see and hear excellent grammar in your communications. It's well worth your while to understand the basic rules underlying the use of who and whom.

The key to understanding when to use who or whom is knowing the difference between subjective case and objective case. Can you always identify the subject of a sentence? Once you can easily identify the subject of a sentence or clause, you will be able to figure out the correct usage of who and whom.

Whom Is Used as an Object

• Who is at the door?
• Whom did you see at the door?

Do you understand why who is correct in one sentence and whom is correct in the other? The answer is, who is always used as the subject of a sentence or clause, and whom is always used as an object.

In the first sentence of the set above, who is the subject. In the second sentence, you is the subject and whom is the direct object.

• Whom did you recommend for the job?
• Are there any people whom you would recommend?

Notice, in both sentences, you is the subject. Whom is the object of the verb recommend.

Whom Is Also Used as the Object of a Preposition

Prepositions include words like to, for, about, under, over, of, after, and before.

Look at these examples:

• I'll begin my letter with the phrase: To Whom It May Concern.
• I don't know from whom the love letter came.
• They fought over whom?
• After whom do I enter the stage?

Do you think these sentence sound odd? They do, indeed. That is exactly why the word whom will probably disappear from the English language one day. It just sounds a little awkward in many circumstances, even when it's technically correct.

So What Can You Do?

First of all, consider your audience. If you find yourself speaking to a person you'd like to impress, like an admission official from Harvard University, for example, then you should simply pause and think before you speak.

It won't sound strange. Think about it; many intelligent people pause a lot while they're talking. They're thinking before they speak!

So if you're speaking in an important situation like the one above, stop and think before using who or whom. Is it subjective case or objective you want to use?

If you're confused about subjects and objects and can't think fast when you find yourself speaking in public, you can either avoid using who and whom or you can go with your gut feeling and say whichever sounds better.

You'll probably be right.

You can also use this simple test in your head.

Silently replace the word with he or him to see which sounds better. He is the equivalent of who (subjective) and him is the equivalent of whom (objective).

For instance, if you want to decide which is correct in this sentence:

Who/Whom should I consider as a college recommendation?

Re-arrange the sentence in your head so it will make sense using him or he. You'll come up with the following choices:

I should consider him...
I should consider he... Him is clearly better. Therefore, the correct word in the sentence above will be whom

========================

   Good Netiquette And A Green Internet To All!  =====================================================================

Tabula Rosa Systems - Tabula Rosa Systems (TRS) is dedicated to providing Best of Breed Technology and Best of Class Professional Services to our Clients. We have a portfolio of products which we have selected for their capabilities, viability and value. TRS provides product, design, implementation and support services on all products that we represent. Additionally, TRS provides expertise in Network Analysis, eBusiness Application Profiling, ePolicy and eBusiness Troubleshooting. We can be contacted at:

sales@tabularosa.net  or 609 818 1802.

 ===============================================================

In addition to this blog, Netiquette IQ has a website with great assets which are being added to on a regular basis. I have authored the premiere book on Netiquette, “Netiquette IQ - A Comprehensive Guide to Improve, Enhance and Add Power to Your Email". My new book, “You’re Hired! Super Charge Your Email Skills in 60 Minutes. . . And Get That Job!” has just been published and will be followed by a trilogy of books on Netiquette for young people. You can view my profile, reviews of the book and content excerpts at:

 www.amazon.com/author/paulbabicki

Anyone who would like to review the book and have it posted on my blog or website, please contact me paul@netiquetteiq.com.

In addition to this blog, I maintain a radio show on BlogtalkRadio  and an online newsletter via paper.li.I have established Netiquette discussion groups with Linkedin and  Yahoo.  I am also a member of the International Business Etiquette and Protocol Group and Minding Manners among others. I regularly consult for the Gerson Lehrman Group, a worldwide network of subject matter experts and I have been contributing to the blogs Everything Email and emailmonday . My work has appeared in numerous publications and I have presented to groups such as The Breakfast Club of NJ and  PSG of Mercer County.