Email intercept laws in the USA

                      

                       






                                                                                  



Several posts have appeared in this blog regarding email privacy and censorship. These are from 1/13, 4/12, 5/16, 5/24 and 5/27. There has been an explosion of discussion  recently regarding email being intercepted by the NSA and other government agencies. There is still a great deal to be learned from what is really happening. To understand the dynamics best, I have put together a list of  laws which have been enacted regarding email intercept. The next few blogs will provide detail on these and what they are meant to accomplish. It is important to note that there have been communication laws since 1986. The following is a list of these:

ECPA (1986) Electronic Communication and Privacy Act
Calea (1994) Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement
Patriot Act (2001) revised in 2006 Established Homeland Security laws
FISA ((2008) Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
FAA FISA (2012) Amendments Act

Look for upcoming posts to define what each act is intended to do ...

Remember you can subscribe to receiving notifications when new blogs are posted:

http://netiquetteiq.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default

If you found value in this blog, please reference it in your social media network!

We will be publishing a book on Netiquette shortly entitled "NetiquetteIQ - A Comprehensive Guide to Improve, Enhance and Add Power to Your Email". Also there will be an email "IQ" test on our website:

 www.netiquetteiq.com

There are discount coupons available on the website. There is no obligation and the savings will be up to 50%.

paul@netiquetteiq.com
Paul Babicki
paul@netiquetteiq.com
+Serkan Gecmen
serkan@netiquetteiq.com
"Good Netiquette Writing!"
#mailiq

Netiquette for email meeting confirmations and reminders

Confirmations: When an invitation is sent out or offered, request a reasonably prompt reply. If the process is automated, reply as quickly as possible. Should a tentative acceptance be necessary, state when a definitive response will be provided. When an invitation has been proffered and no reasonable answer given, it is well within Netiquette guidelines to resend the request after a period of at least twenty-four hours. When initiating a second request, do so in a polite manner, without assumptions or scolding. Rather than feeling ignored, it may very well be the case that you have been the reason for the delay by virtue of a misspelling, wrongly selected email account, or aggressive spam filter. Regardless, it should never be assumed an invitee has received the request, opened it, or had the time to read it.


Reminders: The longer the time between an invitation and an event, the easier it is to have any lapses in attending. It is appropriate Netiquette to make sure that at least one reminder is sent between twenty-four and forty-eight hours of the scheduled event. If any of the attendees are traveling, make sure all are aware of this so as not to cancel or postpone without good reason. If the sender has sent at least one reminder and not had a confirmation, it is prudent either to call or send another polite message notifying the party or parties that without a reply, the meeting will need to be postponed (not canceled).  


Remember you can subscribe to receiving notifications when new blogs are posted:

http://netiquetteiq.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default

If you found value in this blog, please reference it in your social media network!

We will be publishing a book on Netiquette shortly entitled "NetiquetteIQ - A Comprehensive Guide to Improve, Enhance and Add Power to Your Email". Also there will be an email "IQ" test on our website:

 www.netiquetteiq.com

There are discount coupons available on the website. There is no obligation and the savings will be up to 50%.

paul@netiquetteiq.com
Paul Babicki
paul@netiquetteiq.com
+Serkan Gecmen
serkan@netiquetteiq.com
"Good Netiquette Writing!"