The article below is a testament to these theories.
===========================================
Are You Checking Work Email in Bed? At the Dinner Table? On Vacation?
New
research suggests that asking too much of workers during off hours can
seriously backfire.
Mother Jones —By Clive Thompson
| May/June 2014 Issue
My airplane home from Boston is
delayed for takeoff, so the woman next to me pulls out her phones to get some
work done. Like many of us, she has two—an iPhone for her personal life and a
BlackBerry paid for by her employer. "It's a dog leash," she jokes.
"They yank on it and I respond. If somebody from work emails me on Friday
at 10 p.m., they're pissed if I don't write back in five minutes." When I
ask whether she ever just turns it off, she shakes her head in annoyance, as
though I'd uttered something profane. "My team leader would kill me,"
she says.
Cultural
pundits these days often bemoan how people are "addicted" to their
smartphones. We're narcissistic drones, we're told, unable to look away from
the glowing screen, desperate to remain in touch. And it's certainly true that
many of us should probably cool it with social media; nobody needs to check
Twitter that often. But it's also becoming clear that workplace demands
propel a lot of that nervous phone-glancing. In fact, you could view off-hours
email as one of the growing labor issues of our time.
In a recent survey of workers, 50
percent said they checked email while in bed, and 38 percent
"routinely" checked it at the dinner table.
Consider some
recent data: A 2012 survey by the Center for Creative Leadership found that
60 percent of smartphone-using professionals kept in touch with work for a full
13.5 hours per day, and then spent another 5 hours juggling work email each
weekend. That's 72 hours a week of job-related contact. Another survey of 1,000
workers by Good Technology, a mobile-software firm, found that 68
percent checked work email before 8 a.m., 50 percent checked it while in bed,
and 38 percent "routinely" did so at the dinner table. Fully 44 percent of working adults surveyed by the American
Psychological Association reported that they check work email daily while on
vacation—about 1 in 10 checked it hourly. It only gets worse as you move up the
ladder. According to the Pew Research Center, people who make more than $75,000
per year are more likely to fret that their phone makes it impossible for them to stop thinking about work.
Over time, the creep
of off-hours messages from our bosses and colleagues has led us to tolerate
these intrusions as an inevitable part of the job, which is why it's so
startling when an employer is actually straightforward with his lunatic
demands, as with the notorious email a Quinn Emanuel law partner sent to his
underlings back in 2009: "Unless you have very good reason not to (for
example when you are asleep, in court or in a tunnel), you should be checking
your emails every hour."
Constant access
may work out great for employers, since it continues to ratchet up the pressure
for turning off-the-clock, away-from-the-desk hours into just another part of the
workday. But any corresponding economic gains likely aren't being passed on to
workers: During the great internet-age boom in productivity, which is up 23
percent since 2000, the inflation-adjusted wages and benefits for college
graduates climbed just 4 percent, according to the Economic Policy Institute.
The
smartphonification of work isn't all bad, of course. Now, we tell ourselves, we
can dart off to a dental appointment or a child's soccer game during office
hours without wrecking the day's work. Yet this freedom may be just an
illusion; the Center for Creative Leadership found that just as many employees
without a smartphone attended to
"personal tasks" during workday hours as those who did
possess one. Even if you grant the convenience argument, the digital tether
takes a psychic and emotional toll. There's a Heisenbergian uncertainty to
one's putative off-hours, a nagging sense that you can never quite be present
in the here and now, because hey, work might intrude at any moment. You're not
officially working, yet you remain entangled—never quite able to relax and
detach.
If you think you're
distracted now, just wait. By 2015, according to the Radicati Group, a market research firm, we'll be receiving 22
percent more business email (excluding spam) than we did three years ago, and
sending 24 percent more. The messaging habit appears to be deeply woven into corporate
behavior. This late in the game, would it even be possible to sever our
electronic leash—and if so, would it help?
The answers,
research suggests, appear to be "yes" and "yes." Indeed, in
the handful of experiments where employers and employees have imposed strict
limits on messaging, nearly every measure of employee life has improved—without
hurting productivity at all.
Half of the consultants Perlow
studied were glued to work email while on vacation. "My father told me
that it took a wedding to actually have a conversation with me," one said.
Consider the
study run by Harvard professor
Leslie Perlow. A few years ago, she had been examining the workload
of a team at the Boston Consulting Group. High-paid consultants are the
crystal-meth tweakers of the always-on world: "My father told me that it
took a wedding to actually have a conversation with me," one of them told
Perlow.
"You're
constantly checking your BlackBerry to see if somebody needs you. You're home
but you're not home," Deborah Lovich,
the former BCG partner who led the team, told me. And they weren't happy about
it: 51 percent of the consultants in Perlow's study were checking their email
"continuously" while on vacation.
Perlow
suggested they carve out periods of "predictable time off"—evening
and weekend periods where team members would be out of bounds. Nobody was
allowed to ping them. The rule would be strictly enforced, to ensure they could
actually be free of that floating "What if someone's contacting me?"
feeling.
The results
were immediate and powerful. The employees exhibited significantly lower stress
levels. Time off actually rejuvenated them: More than half said they were
excited to get to work in the morning, nearly double the number who said so
before the policy change. And the proportion of consultants who said they were
satisfied with their jobs leaped from 49 percent to 72 percent. Most
remarkably, their weekly work hours actually shrank by 11 percent—without any
loss in productivity. "What happens when you constrain time?" Lovich
asks. "The low-value stuff goes away," but the crucial work still
gets done.
The group's
clients either didn't notice any change or reported that the consultants' work
had improved (perhaps because they weren't dealing with twitchy freaks
anymore). The "predictable time off" program worked so well that BCG
has expanded it to the entire firm. "People in Brussels would go to work
with a team in London that was working this way, and they came back saying,
'We've got to do this,'" Lovich says.
"What happens when you
constrain time?" Lovich asks. "The low-value stuff goes away,"
but the crucial work gets done.
For even
starker proof of the value of cutting back on email, consider an experiment run in 2012 by Gloria Mark, a pioneering expert
on workplace focus. Mark, a professor at the
University of California-Irvine, had long studied the disruptive
nature of messaging, and found that office workers are multitasked to death:
They can only focus on a given task for three minutes before being interrupted.
Granted, there isn't any hard data on how often people were pulled away 20 or
30 years ago, but this level of distraction, she told me, simply goes too far:
"You're switching like mad."
Mark decided to
find out what would happen if a workplace not only decreased its email, but
went entirely cold turkey. She found a group of 13 office workers and convinced
their superiors to let them try it for a whole week. No digital messaging, full
stop—not only during evenings and weekends, but even at their desks during the
9-to-5 hours. If they wanted to contact workmates, they'd have to use the phone
or talk face to face.
The dramatic
result? An enormously calmer, happier group of subjects. Mark put heart rate
monitors on the employees while they worked, and discovered that their physical
metrics of stress decreased significantly. They also reported feeling less
plagued by self-interruptions—that nagging fear of missing out that makes you
neurotically check your inbox every few minutes. "I was able to plan more
what I was doing for a chunk of time," one worker told her.
These studies highlight the dirty
little secret of corporate email: Most of it may be pretty useless.
When the
message flow decreased, so did the hectic multitasking efforts. Mark found that
workers were flipping between windows on their screens half as often and spent
twice as much time focusing on each task. Again, there was no decline in
productivity. They were still getting their jobs done.
Mark's and
Perlow's studies were small. But they each highlight the dirty little secret of
corporate email: The majority of it may be pretty useless. Genuinely important
emails can propel productive work, no doubt, but a lot of messages aren't like
that—they're incessant check-ins asking noncrucial questions, or bulk-CCing of
everybody on a team. They amount to a sort of Kabuki performance of work—one
that stresses everyone out while accomplishing little. Or, as the Center for
Creative Leadership grimly concludes: "The 'always on' expectations of
professionals enable organizations to mask poor processes, indecision,
dysfunctional cultures, and subpar infrastructure because they know that
everyone will pick up the slack."
Now, you could see these
experiments as amazingly good news: It's possible to rein in some of our
counterproductive digital behavior!
But here's the
catch: Because it's a labor issue, it can only be tackled at the organizational
level. An individual employee can't arbitrarily decide to reduce endless
messaging; everyone has to do so together. "People are so interconnected
at work, if someone tries to cut themselves off, they're punishing
themselves," Mark notes.
Only a handful
of enlightened firms have tackled this problem companywide. At Bandwidth, a tech company
with 300-plus employees, CEO David Morken
grew tired of feeling only half-present when he was at home with his six
children, so he started encouraging his staff to unplug during their leisure
time and actually prohibited his vacationing employees from checking email at all—anything
vital had to be referred to colleagues. Morken has had to sternly warn people
who break the vacation rule; he asks his employees to narc on anyone who sends
work messages to someone who's off—as well as those who sneak a peek at their
email when they are supposed to be kicking back on a beach. "You have to
make it a firm, strict policy," he says. "I had to impose it because
the methlike addiction of connection is so strong."
Once his people
got a taste of totally disconnected off-time, however, they loved it. Morken is
convinced that his policy works in the company's self-interest: Burned-out,
neurotic employees who never step away from work are neither productive nor
creative. It appears everyone wins when the boss offers workers ample time to unplug—tunnel
or no tunnel.
========================================
Here is a special item on our blog site! Take the official McAfee phishing quiz at the following link:
McAfee Phishing Quiz
It is not easy, see what I mean!
================================
In addition to this blog, I have authored the premiere book on Netiquette, "Netiquette IQ - A Comprehensive Guide to Improve, Enhance and Add Power to Your Email". You can view my profile, reviews of the book and content excerpts at:
www.amazon.com/author/paulbabicki
If you would like to listen to experts in all aspects of Netiquette and communication, try my radio show on BlogtalkRadio and an online newsletter via paper.li.I have established Netiquette discussion groups with Linkedin and Yahoo. I am also a member of the International Business Etiquette and Protocol Group and Minding Manners among others. I regularly consult for the Gerson Lehrman Group, a worldwide network of subject matter experts and I have been contributing to the blogs Everything Email and emailmonday . My work has appeared in numerous publications and I have presented to groups such as The Breakfast Club of NJ Rider University and PSG of Mercer County, NJ.
=========================================
No comments:
Post a Comment