The Boardroom and the Bedroom
How both dating and finance have been screwed by the Internet.
By Ari Ratner
Your parents dated the
way Warren Buffett picks a stock: a close review of the prospectus over dinner,
careful analysis of long-term growth potential, detailed real asset evaluation.
Sure, the old economy dating market in which they participated
had the occasional speculative frenzy: Woodstock, V-E day, whatever went on at
Studio 54. My parents met during spring break. In Florida.
But love and its compounding interests were usually pursued with
appropriate due diligence.
Then came the Internet. The “innovation” that has driven
the financial industry over the last two decades has also transformed the
dating market, with similar effects on romance as on the economy. The
traditional focus on long-term security—marriage and retirement—has been
replaced by a relentless pursuit of instant gratification and immediate
returns. These days, the Wolf is as much on Tinder as on Wall Street.
Just look at what online dating has done to the meet market. The
speed and frequency of transactions has gone up. Volatility has spiked as
relationship investment strategy has changed from building long-term value to
quarterly—or nightly—profits. New investors have entered the market with
greater ease, although all too often only to be taken advantage of by more
sophisticated players. New avenues for fraud have opened up: Manti Te’o meet
Bernie Madoff on Ashley Madison.
Even inequality has risen. Some investors are rolling in it; others have just
lost their shirts.
How did the bedroom end up looking so much like the boardroom?
In successive waves, innovation pioneered in the financial
markets has been adopted to dating. Online dating’s initial trading
platforms—Match created in 1995, JDate in 1997, etc.—were the relationship
equivalent to the online trading sites that first allowed investors to directly
manage their own portfolios. Think “Talk to Chuck,” except if he can message you first (hopefully
not about the size of his portfolio).
Then came quantitative trading. EHarmony’s “scientific
approach” came out in 2000, with later editions augmented by an “algorithm of love.” OkCupid, launched in 2004, has brought us
big-data dating. The site captures a “datacylsm” of online behavior to be romanticized—and
monetized.
And sure enough, as in finance, quants soon turned to
data-driven approaches to skew the market to their advantage. Slate contributor
Amy Webb “hacked”
OkCupid using an algorithm to eventually find love.
Then came high-frequency trading. Sites like Grindr, launched in
2009, or Tinder, launched in 2012, give a whole new meaning to what Michael
Lewis has described as “flash boys”
in the financial markets. We now swipe left or right so quickly that we can’t
even fully process the transactions—in this case, people—flashing across our
screens.
Online daters are also mirroring the move away from vanilla
investments to more exotic or niche offerings.
In the old days, you could easily invest only in broad
categories of assets: stocks, treasuries, major international markets.
Nowadays, everyone can easily pursue his or her own 50 shades of investment
strategy. Want to invest in New Zealand wool? Click here.
Looking for a furrymate? Try here.
To be clear, I make no judgment against adults consensually
engaging with other adults—whether in the marketplace or in their private
lives. The transformation accompanying digital dating has been complex. It has
brought both new opportunities and new risks.
=======================================
===========================================
In addition to this blog, I have authored the premiere book on Netiquette, " Netiquette IQ - A Comprehensive Guide to Improve, Enhance and Add Power to Your Email". You can view my profile, reviews of the book and content excerpts at:
www.amazon.com/author/paulbabicki
If you would like to listen to experts in all aspects of Netiquette and communication, try my radio show on BlogtalkRadio and an online newsletter via paper.li.I have established Netiquette discussion groups with Linkedin and Yahoo. I am also a member of the International Business Etiquette and Protocol Group and Minding Manners among others. I regularly consult for the Gerson Lehrman Group, a worldwide network of subject matter experts and I have been contributing to the blogs Everything Email and emailmonday . My work has appeared in numerous publications and I have presented to groups such as The Breakfast Club of NJ Rider University and PSG of Mercer County, NJ.
=======================================================
Great Reasons for Purchasing Netiquette IQ
· Get more email opens. Improve 100% or more.
· Receive more responses, interviews, appointments, prospects and sales.
· Be better understood.
· Eliminate indecision.
· Avoid being spammed 100% or more.
· Have recipient finish reading your email content.
· Save time by reducing questions.
· Increase your level of clarity.
· Improve you time management with your email.
· Have quick access to a wealth of relevant email information.
Enjoy most of what you need for email in a single book.===========================================
In addition to this blog, I have authored the premiere book on Netiquette, " Netiquette IQ - A Comprehensive Guide to Improve, Enhance and Add Power to Your Email". You can view my profile, reviews of the book and content excerpts at:
www.amazon.com/author/paulbabicki
If you would like to listen to experts in all aspects of Netiquette and communication, try my radio show on BlogtalkRadio and an online newsletter via paper.li.I have established Netiquette discussion groups with Linkedin and Yahoo. I am also a member of the International Business Etiquette and Protocol Group and Minding Manners among others. I regularly consult for the Gerson Lehrman Group, a worldwide network of subject matter experts and I have been contributing to the blogs Everything Email and emailmonday . My work has appeared in numerous publications and I have presented to groups such as The Breakfast Club of NJ Rider University and PSG of Mercer County, NJ.
=======================================================
No comments:
Post a Comment